You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A key advantage of using native julia code instead of GDAL is we can do everything lazily.
Recently using GeoJSON.jl with Rasters.jl I found it effortlessly handled rasterizing 3GB files that crashed GDAL. The same should be true of this package (it likely already is in some cases, but we can make it a lot more so).
I've spoken with @visr abouit lazy loading here, but making this issue to track implementation.
The idea would be to eagerly load shape metadata like bounds and type, and lazily load the point vectors.
(And although this is an old format disciplines like ecology are totally dependent on it, often with multi-GB files)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A key advantage of using native julia code instead of GDAL is we can do everything lazily.
Recently using GeoJSON.jl with Rasters.jl I found it effortlessly handled rasterizing 3GB files that crashed GDAL. The same should be true of this package (it likely already is in some cases, but we can make it a lot more so).
I've spoken with @visr abouit lazy loading here, but making this issue to track implementation.
The idea would be to eagerly load shape metadata like bounds and type, and lazily load the point vectors.
(And although this is an old format disciplines like ecology are totally dependent on it, often with multi-GB files)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: