You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sorry for the bad title, best I could come up with.
The Julia language manual specifies that base packages should not have version numbers, but the new approach to version numbering cancels that. See thread here for full information:
Should one consider mentioning with a warning box or something, that version number system is being updated in the official manual as well i.e. the discourse post content put it in, in some way?
Kind regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry for the bad title, best I could come up with.
The Julia language manual specifies that base packages should not have version numbers, but the new approach to version numbering cancels that. See thread here for full information:
JuliaTesting/Aqua.jl#294 (comment)
Relevant links:
https://discourse.julialang.org/t/psa-compat-requirements-in-the-general-registry-are-changing/104958
https://github.com/JuliaLang/Pkg.jl/blob/master/docs/src/managing-packages.md
Should one consider mentioning with a warning box or something, that version number system is being updated in the official manual as well i.e. the discourse post content put it in, in some way?
Kind regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: