You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should we introduce an interims type AbstractRiemannianManifold <: AbstractManifold and a AbstractSemiRiemannianManifold <: AbstractManifold to distinguish between manifolds that are Riemannian and those that are not? Might be too complicated since it depends on the metric and then the MetricManifold-Decorator might actually change that?
I'd prefer to have a trait instead of an abstract type like AbstractRiemannianManifold but there should definitely be a way to distinguish Riemannian and pseudo-Riemannian manifolds.
Semi-Riemannian manifolds require different methods, see https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.07643 .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: