We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rfft!
Hi,
since there is a PR for rfft! in FFTW we probably should also add rfft! in AbstractFFTs?
In general in-place real-to-complex FFT seems to be supported by CuFFT as well, right?
I recall that I was discussing this somewhere with @maleadt but I can't remember exactly.
What do you think about that?
Best,
Felix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just want to add my two cents to say I'd like an in-place real to complex FFT for my application, too.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
since there is a PR for
rfft!
in FFTW we probably should also addrfft!
in AbstractFFTs?In general in-place real-to-complex FFT seems to be supported by CuFFT as well, right?
I recall that I was discussing this somewhere with @maleadt but I can't remember exactly.
What do you think about that?
Best,
Felix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: