We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In the Construction section of the package documentation, it is said
Construction
In contrast, the `cask` grouping factor is *nested* within the `batch` grouping factor in the *Pastes* data.
I know that it can be implicitly modeled as if the cast is nested within batch.
cast
batch
However, is it really appropriate to say that the factor cask rather than sample ( = cask * batch) is nested within the factor batch?
cask
sample
= cask * batch
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
In the
Construction
section of the package documentation, it is saidIn contrast, the `cask` grouping factor is *nested* within the `batch` grouping factor in the *Pastes* data.
I know that it can be implicitly modeled as if the
cast
is nested withinbatch
.However, is it really appropriate to say that the factor
cask
rather thansample
(= cask * batch
) is nested within the factorbatch
?Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: