Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SCIM claims conveyer profile? #98

Open
xmlgrrl opened this issue Jul 30, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

SCIM claims conveyer profile? #98

xmlgrrl opened this issue Jul 30, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@xmlgrrl
Copy link

xmlgrrl commented Jul 30, 2014

At the Cloud Identity Summit in July 2014, there was some discussion of sourcing a single user's information through a SCIM interface in combination with OpenID Connect. The same idea applies to UMA's claim profiling: A claims-aware client could push SCIM-encoded user information to the AS. Should this be considered as an additional profile in the Claim Profiles spec?

@andihindle
Copy link

It seems valuable to at least include this as an option. SCIM may or may not gain real traction (I suspect it will, though it may take time), but supporting interoperability at this stage costs us relatively little and may be helpful longer term.

@hisgarden
Copy link

This is a valuable profile and relatively straightforward to implement.

Thanks, Jin Wen

On Jul 30, 2014, at 12:55, Eve Maler <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

At the Cloud Identity Summit in July 2014, there was some discussion of sourcing a single user's information through a SCIM interface in combination with OpenID Connect. The same idea applies to UMA's claim profiling: A claims-aware client could push SCIM-encoded user information to the AS. Should this be considered as an additional profile in the Claim Profiles spec?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/98.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants