Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

processODP module report from the 2nd evaluation #260

Open
7 of 9 tasks
Tracked by #287
huanyu-li opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
7 of 9 tasks
Tracked by #287

processODP module report from the 2nd evaluation #260

huanyu-li opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@huanyu-li
Copy link
Member

huanyu-li commented Oct 9, 2024

ProcessODP 0.2

Report from OOPS!

  • P39, Ambiguous namespace
  • P13, Inverse relationships not explicitly declared
  • P10, Missing disjointness
  • P08, Missing annotations, actorODP:participationIn. It was removed as it's not needed.
  • P11, Missing domain or range in properties, processODP:hasInput, processODP:hasExecutionInput, processODP:hasExecutionOutput, processODP:isSettingFor, processODP:hasOutput, processODP:occursAtLocation, actorODP:participationIn. The domain/range of remaining are left empty for flexibility.

Report from FOOPS!

  • R1, Recommended/Detailed metadata, doi, publisher, logo, status, issued, OPTIONAL: precious version, backwards compatibility, modified
  • F4, Error when retrieving prefix
  • F4/A2, Ontology not found in a public registry
  • F1, Ontology URI is different from ontology ID, Your ontologyURI (e.g., its w3id) should be the same as the one used within the ontology itself. Ontology URI: http://w3id.org/CEON/ontology/processODP. Provided URI: https://w3id.org/CEON/ontology/processODP/0.2
@huanyu-li huanyu-li changed the title Pitfall Report from FOOPS! processODP module report from the 2nd evaluation Oct 10, 2024
@huanyu-li
Copy link
Member Author

huanyu-li commented Oct 20, 2024

See the following comments:
#259 (comment)
#259 (comment)
#259 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant