-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
First documentation pages #346
Comments
I've added a first version of the usage summary to the @hartig Is this on a good level of detail or did you have anything else in mind? |
For the detailed instructions I assume we will be using the wiki? |
Which branch exactly? Is (or was) this in a PR?
This question is related to one of the two proposals that I wanted you to work out (see my Malaga follow-up email). |
Okay, I viewed the two as separate issues but now I see your point. I'll respond by email. The branch I referred to with updated README is 346-first-documentation-pages. |
I've copied and updated the instructions from the wiki and added them to the web page. Instead of linking to the source code, the class and package references are now linked to the Javadoc. I've also added some simplified user documentation: https://liusemweb.github.io/HeFQUIN/doc/ I've assumed that a release will look as described in https://github.com/LiUSemWeb/HeFQUIN/wiki/Release-Logistics |
Great. Thanks! Yet, I understand all of these pages that have been in the wiki as documentation for contributors, not for users. Therefore, if we understand the "Docs" menu item on the Website as the entry point for the user documentation, then the links to these pages shouldn't show up there. Instead, we would need another menu item called, say, "Get Involved" (as on the Jena site) which is the entry point to the documentation pages for contributors.
Thanks for that one as well! I haven't looked at it yet and understand that this is a first step towards a more comprehensive documentation for users (covering at least the points listed above). In this sense, we will have to think about how we are going to organize all these (user) documentation pages; in other words, we need some form of a table of contents for the user documentation.
Not sure what you wanted to say with this sentence ;-) |
As a first set of documentation pages for potential users of HeFQUIN (users != developers who want to work on HeFQUIN itself), we need the following pages.
/cc @keski
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: