Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement TightVNC-2.x file transfer #624

Open
ThomasKalten opened this issue Jul 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Implement TightVNC-2.x file transfer #624

ThomasKalten opened this issue Jul 5, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@ThomasKalten
Copy link

If you'd like to put out an incentive for implementing this feature, you can do so at https://issuehunt.io/r/LibVNC/libvncserver

When accessing Android mobile devices on which runs droidVNC-NG using libvncserver, we have to switch the vncviewer to the old outdated tight-VNC 1.3 on Windows. That is annoying.

As far as I see it, there is support for TightVNC-1.3 file transfer.
Is there any reason why the TightVNC-2.x file transfer is not implemented yet - besides the lack of resources?
Tight-VNC did not change there license it is still GPL2, so this could not be a reason.
Did somebody tried it already and did have some technical problems?
May be because it is difficult to integrate it in the current structure of libvncserver.

Thanks for any information on this topic.

@bk138
Copy link
Member

bk138 commented Jul 6, 2024

As far as I see it, there is support for TightVNC-1.3 file transfer.

Correct.

Is there any reason why the TightVNC-2.x file transfer is not implemented yet - besides the lack of resources?

Basically "just" lack of resources.

Tight-VNC did not change there license it is still GPL2, so this could not be a reason. Did somebody tried it already and did have some technical problems?

Not that I know.

May be because it is difficult to integrate it in the current structure of libvncserver.

While there's still lots of legacy cruft, we have updated the internal structure bit by bit, so that should not pose a problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants