-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Negative Loss, Zero Success and Zero AoC #21
Comments
Hi!Have you solved this? |
I encountered the same problem. All the evaluation indicators were 0, including AOC, Success Rate ... |
What confuses me is that the following two projects based on LIBERO also have success rate = 0 and Aoc = 0. No matter how we train, the result is 0. Is it because the details of our configuration are incorrect? I would like to ask for your help. Thank you very much! @Cranial-XIX |
After 20 epochs of training, the success rate would become larger than 0. And after 50 epochs of training, the average success rate is around 0.7. (for |
Have you ever tried libero-90? For libero-90, it seems the problem still exists for me. Thank you very much! |
The success rate on libero-90 is low by design (since there are 90 tasks), and in general, you might need over 20 epochs (like 25 - 35) to reach the peak result. |
Hi,
Thanks for the interesting paper and releasing the code.
I am facing the same issue ("TypeError: h5py objects cannot be pickled") while running with num_worker=4. However, the code works when i set num_worker=0 with some additional transformation of input image in the policy file.
The loss becomes negative after the first epoch for different algorithm with 0 success. Consequently, the AoC is 0.
Could you please comment on that.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: