You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to integrate VoCo into my pretraining framework and have a few questions.
Currently the repo seems to diverge from the method described in the paper as it does a teacher-student approach that is never mentioned in the paper. Q1: Where can I find the original implementation of the code from the paper? Is there an old branch I can checkout that holds this?
Q2: How does the teacher-student setting affect overall performance? Is it needed to avoid feature collapse? Or why was it added?
Q3: You seem to do additional augmentations on the subcrops independently of each other. Do I need to flip/rotate these subcrops independently? Did you experiment how on how important this independent augmentation is?
Cheers,
Tassilo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, many thanks for your attention to our work and sorry for my late reply.
A similar issue was raised in #15. Teacher-student is widely adopted in pre-training and is slightly better than our original implementation. It will be introduced in our new version of paper.
In our augmentation, random filp/rotate is performed independently on each subcrop. I have not yet evaluated its importance, since we consider it as a basic setting. In general, random augmentation is also important in pre-training.
Dear researchers, our work is now available at Large-Scale-Medical, if you are still interested in this topic. Thank you very much for your attention to our work, it does encourage me a lot!
Hello,
I would like to integrate VoCo into my pretraining framework and have a few questions.
Currently the repo seems to diverge from the method described in the paper as it does a teacher-student approach that is never mentioned in the paper.
Q1: Where can I find the original implementation of the code from the paper? Is there an old branch I can checkout that holds this?
Q2: How does the teacher-student setting affect overall performance? Is it needed to avoid feature collapse? Or why was it added?
Q3: You seem to do additional augmentations on the subcrops independently of each other. Do I need to flip/rotate these subcrops independently? Did you experiment how on how important this independent augmentation is?
Cheers,
Tassilo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: