Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Synchronizing DOI metadata #2159

Open
bemoody opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Synchronizing DOI metadata #2159

bemoody opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@bemoody
Copy link
Collaborator

bemoody commented Dec 4, 2023

When we publish a project on PhysioNet, we also create a DOI and publish various metadata using the DataCite API.

From time to time we may want to make improvements to this metadata, such as by adding new fields (e.g. pull #2154, #2119).

It is also possible - though discouraged! - for site administrators to modify projects after publication, such as to fix a typo in a project title or an author's name.

In both cases, we want to update the information for existing projects. It doesn't have to be done immediately but it should be done reasonably quickly, and automatically.

We could try to track whether a particular DOI needs updating, but this could be complicated and error-prone. It feels like it would be better just to update all published DOIs regularly (say, once a week), as long as it's not a burden on the API.

@bemoody
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bemoody commented Aug 13, 2024

Recently Tom mentioned that PhysioNet publications appear (magically?) on people's ORCID profiles.

Since that's not anything we're doing, I assume that it happens because ORCID pulls the information from DataCite.

So that is another important case: we need to regularly re-publish DataCite info so that ORCID will see it (authors can always add/remove an ORCID profile after publishing projects.)

@tompollard
Copy link
Member

Since that's not anything we're doing, I assume that it happens because ORCID pulls the information from DataCite.

That's right, see: #1931

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants