Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question Regarding Shot Evaluation in ATOMIC-VAEP #831

Open
GeonHeeJo2000 opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Question Regarding Shot Evaluation in ATOMIC-VAEP #831

GeonHeeJo2000 opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@GeonHeeJo2000
Copy link

GeonHeeJo2000 commented Oct 14, 2024

Hello,
I am currently conducting research on VAEP and ATOMIC-VAEP, focusing on using the expected values from ATOMIC-VAEP to evaluate player performance. As ATOMIC-VAEP evaluates based on expected values, the credit or penalty is assigned depending on the outcome of a shot—either 'goal' or 'out'.
However, I have a question regarding certain shot outcomes. Specifically, I noticed that events like hitting the post, being blocked, or saved by the goalkeeper do not result in an explicit event being inserted, unlike shots that result in a goal or go out of play. Is there a particular reason why these outcomes are not accounted for?

In such cases, the shot may receive a disproportionately high value. For example, in penalty kicks, an 'out' result is inserted when the ball goes off the field. However, in other cases, no result value is inserted, leading to a potential issue where penalty kicks that miss the target do not receive a high enough penalty. This could result in an excessively high value being assigned to shots that fail to result in a goal, particularly when no 'out' is recorded.

Thank you for your time, and I look forward to your response.

image
image

@GeonHeeJo2000 GeonHeeJo2000 changed the title Question Regarding Penalty Kick Handling in ATOMIC-VAEP Algorithm Question Regarding Shot Evaluation in ATOMIC-VAEP Oct 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant