downstream CI for GraphMakie? #4215
anandijain
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments
-
I think it should be, maybe if it can be triggered manually somehow (maybe by a commit comment or PR comment)? That way, we don't waste time if Makie's CI doesn't pass, and it's easier to tell if PRs have failed internal CI or the new downstream CI. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I think it would be interesting to have this for releases. Always running this would be too much though |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
would a PR adding downstream CI for GraphMakie like https://github.com/SciML/ModelingToolkit.jl/blob/master/.github/workflows/Downstream.yml be accepted?
I ask because GraphMakie tests don't seem to pass with 0.17, maybe it'd be nice to know for a subset of dependents when things are breaking for that package. AoG may be good too
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions