In many problems dealing with an array (or a LinkedList), we are asked to find or calculate something among all the contiguous subarrays (or sublists) of a given size. For example, take a look at this problem:
https://leetcode.com/problems/maximum-average-subarray-i/
Given an array, find the average of all contiguous subarrays of size
K
in it.
Lets understand this problem with a real input:
Array: [1, 3, 2, 6, -1, 4, 1, 8, 2], K=5
A brute-force algorithm will calculate the sum of every 5-element contiguous subarray of the given array and divide the sum by 5 to find the average.
function findAvgOfSubarrays(arr, K) {
const results = []
for(let i = 0; i < arr.length - K + 1; i++) {
let sum = 0
for(let j = i; j < i + K; j++) {
sum += arr[j]
}
results.push(sum/K)
}
return results
}
findAvgOfSubarrays([1, 3, 2, 6, -1, 4, 1, 8, 2], 5)
Time complexity: Since for every element of the input array, we are calculating the sum of its next K
elements, the time complexity of the above algorithm will be O(N*K)
where N
is the number of elements in the input array.
The inefficiency is that for any two consecutive subarrays of size 5
, the overlapping part (which will contain four elements) will be evaluated twice.
The efficient way to solve this problem would be to visualize each contiguous subarray as a sliding window of 5
elements. This means that we will slide the window by one element when we move on to the next subarray. To reuse the sum from the previous subarray, we will subtract the element going out of the window and add the element now being included in the sliding window. This will save us from going through the whole subarray to find the sum and, as a result, the algorithm complexity will reduce to O(N)
.
Here is the algorithm for the Sliding Window approach:
function findAveragesOfSubarrays(arr, k) {
//sliding window approach
const results = []
let windowSum = 0
let windowStart = 0
for(let windowEnd = 0; windowEnd < arr.length; windowEnd++) {
//add the next element
windowSum += arr[windowEnd]
//slide the window forward
//we don't need to slide if we have not hit the required window size of k
if (windowEnd >= k - 1) {
//we are **AUTOMATICALLY** returning the window average once we hit the window size of k
//and pushing to the output array
results.push(windowSum/k)
//subtracting the element going out
windowSum -= arr[windowStart]
//then sliding the window forward
windowStart++
//adding the element coming in, in the outer/previous loop
//and repeating this process until we hit the end of the array
}
}
return results
}
findAveragesOfSubarrays([1, 3, 2, 6, -1, 4, 1, 8, 2], 5)//[2.2, 2.8, 2.4, 3.6, 2.8]
https://leetcode.com/problems/largest-subarray-length-k/
Given an array of positive numbers and a positive number
K
, find the maximum sum of any contiguous subarray of sizeK
.
A basic brute force solution will be to calculate the sum of all K
sized subarrays of the given array to find the subarray with the highest sum. We can start from every index of the given array and add the next K
elements to find the subarrays sum.
function maxSubarrayOfSizeK(arr, k) {
//brute force
let maxSum = 0
let windowSum = 0
//loop through array
for(let i = 0; i < arr.length -k + 1; i++) {
//keep track of sum in current window
windowSum = 0
for(let j = i; j < i + k; j++) {
windowSum += arr[j]
}
//if currentWindowSum is > maxWindowSum
//set currentWindwoSum to maxWindowSum
maxSum = Math.max(maxSum, windowSum)
}
return maxSum
}
maxSubarrayOfSizeK(3, [2, 1, 5, 1, 3, 2])//9
maxSubarrayOfSizeK(2, [2, 3, 4, 1, 5])//7
- Time complexity will be
O(N*K)
, whereN
is the total number of elements in the given array
If you observe closely, you will realize that to calculate the sum of a contiguous subarray, we can utilize the sum of the previous subarray. For this, consider each subarray as a Sliding Window of size K
. To calculate the sum of the next subarray, we need to slide the window ahead by one element. So to slide the window forward and calculate the sum of the new position of the sliding window, we need to do two things:
- Subtract the element going out of the sliding window, i.e., subtract the first element of the window.
- Add the new element getting included in the sliding window, i.e., the element coming right after the end of the window.
This approach will save us from re-calculating the sum of the overlapping part of the sliding window.
function maxSubarrayOfSizeK(arr, k) {
//sliding window
let maxSum = 0
let windowSum = 0
let windowStart = 0
//loop through array
for(let windowEnd = 0; windowEnd < arr.length; windowEnd++) {
//add the next element
windowSum += arr[windowEnd]
//slide the window, we dont need to slid if we
//haven't hit the required window size of 'k'
if(windowEnd >= k -1) {
maxSum = Math.max(maxSum, windowSum)
//subtract the element going out
windowSum -= arr[windowStart]
//slide the window ahead
windowStart ++
}
}
return maxSum
}
maxSubarrayOfSizeK([2, 1, 5, 1, 3, 2], 3)//9
maxSubarrayOfSizeK([2, 3, 4, 1, 5], 2)//7
- The time complexity of the above algorithm will be
O(N)
- The space complexity of the above algorithm will be
O(1)
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-size-subarray-sum/
Given an array of positive numbers and a positive number
S
, find the length of the smallest contiguous subarray whose sum is greater than or equal toS
.Return 0 if no such subarray exists.
This problem follows the Sliding Window pattern, and we can use a similar strategy as discussed in Maximum Sum Subarray of Size K. There is one difference though: in this problem, the sliding window size is not fixed. Here is how we will solve this problem:
- First, we will add-up elements from the beginning of the array until their sum becomes greater than or equal to
S
. - These elements will constitute our sliding window. We are asked to find the smallest such window having a sum greater than or equal to
S
. We will remember the length of this window as the smallest window so far. - After this, we will keep adding one element in the sliding window (i.e., slide the window ahead) in a stepwise fashion.
- In each step, we will also try to shrink the window from the beginning. We will shrink the window until the windows sum is smaller than
S
again. This is needed as we intend to find the smallest window. This shrinking will also happen in multiple steps; in each step, we will do two things:
- Check if the current window length is the smallest so far, and if so, remember its length.
- Subtract the first element of the window from the running sum to shrink the sliding window.
function smallestSubarrayWithGivenSum(arr, s) {
//sliding window, BUT the window size is not fixed
let windowSum = 0
let minLength = Infinity
let windowStart = 0
//First, we will add-up elements from the beginning of the array until their sum becomes greater than or equal to S.
for(windowEnd = 0; windowEnd < arr.length; windowEnd++) {
//add the next element
windowSum += arr[windowEnd]
//shrink the window as small as possible
//until windowSum is small than s
while(windowSum >= s) {
//These elements will constitute our sliding window. We are asked to find the smallest such window having a sum greater than or equal to S. We will remember the length of this window as the smallest window so far.
//After this, we will keep adding one element in the sliding window (i.e., slide the window ahead) in a stepwise fashion.
//In each step, we will also try to shrink the window from the beginning. We will shrink the window until the windows sum is smaller than S again. This is needed as we intend to find the smallest window. This shrinking will also happen in multiple steps; in each step, we will do two things:
//Check if the current window length is the smallest so far, and if so, remember its length.
minLength = Math.min(minLength, windowEnd - windowStart + 1)
//Subtract the first element of the window from the running sum to shrink the sliding window.
windowSum -= arr[windowStart]
windowStart++
}
}
if(minLength === Infinity) {
return 0
}
return minLength
}
smallestSubarrayWithGivenSum([2, 1, 5, 2, 3, 2], 7)//2
smallestSubarrayWithGivenSum([2, 1, 5, 2, 8], 7)//1
smallestSubarrayWithGivenSum([3, 4, 1, 1, 6], 8)//3
- The time complexity of the above algorithm will be
O(N)
. The outer for loop runs for all elements, and the inner while loop processes each element only once; therefore, the time complexity of the algorithm will beO(N+N)
), which is asymptotically equivalent toO(N)
. - The algorithm runs in constant space
O(1)
.
https://leetcode.com/problems/longest-substring-with-at-most-k-distinct-characters/
Given a string, find the length of the longest substring in it with no more than
K
distinct characters.You can assume that
K
is less than or equal to the length of the given string.
This problem follows the Sliding Window pattern, and we can use a similar dynamic sliding window strategy as discussed in Smallest Subarray with a given sum. We can use a HashMap to remember the frequency of each character we have processed. Here is how we will solve this problem:
- First, we will insert characters from the beginning of the string until we have
K
distinct characters in the HashMap. - These characters will constitute our sliding window. We are asked to find the longest such window having no more than
K
distinct characters. We will remember the length of this window as the longest window so far. - After this, we will keep adding one character in the sliding window (i.e., slide the window ahead) in a stepwise fashion.
- In each step, we will try to shrink the window from the beginning if the count of distinct characters in the HashMap is larger than
K
. We will shrink the window until we have no more thanK
distinct characters in the HashMap. This is needed as we intend to find the longest window. - While shrinking, well decrement the characters frequency going out of the window and remove it from the HashMap if its frequency becomes zero.
- At the end of each step, well check if the current window length is the longest so far, and if so, remember its length.
function longestSubstringWithKdistinct(str, k) {
// Given a string, find the length of the longest substring in it with no more than K distinct characters.
let windowStart = 0
let maxLength = 0
let charFrequency = {}
//in the following loop we'll try to extend the range [windowStart, windowEnd]
for(let windowEnd = 0; windowEnd < str.length; windowEnd++) {
const endChar = str[windowEnd]
if(!(endChar in charFrequency)) {
charFrequency[endChar] = 0
}
charFrequency[endChar]++
//shrink the window until we are left with k distinct characters
//in the charFrequency Object
while(Object.keys(charFrequency).length > k) {
//insert characters from the beginning of the string until we have 'K' distinct characters in the hashMap
//these characters will consitutue our sliding window. We are asked to find the longest such window having no more that K distinct characters. We will remember the length of the window as the longest window so far
//we will keep adding on character in the sliding window in a stepwise fashion
//in each step we will try to shrink the window from the beginning if the count of distinct characters in the hashmap is larger than K. We will shrink the window until we have no more that K distinct characters in the HashMap
const startChar = str[windowStart]
charFrequency[startChar]--
//while shrinking , we will decrement the characters frequency going out of the window and remove it from the HashMap if it's frequency becomes zero
if(charFrequency[startChar] === 0) {
delete charFrequency[startChar]
}
windowStart++
}
//after each step we will check if the current window length is the longest so far, and if so, remember it's length
maxLength = Math.max(maxLength, windowEnd - windowStart + 1)
}
return maxLength
};
longestSubstringWithKdistinct("araaci", 2)//4, The longest substring with no more than '2' distinct characters is "araa".
longestSubstringWithKdistinct("araaci", 1)//2, The longest substring with no more than '1' distinct characters is "aa".
longestSubstringWithKdistinct("cbbebi", 3)//5, The longest substrings with no more than '3' distinct characters are "cbbeb" & "bbebi".
- The above algorithms time complexity will be
O(N)
, whereN
is the number of characters in the input string. The outer for loop runs for all characters, and the inner while loop processes each character only once; therefore, the time complexity of the algorithm will beO(N+N)
, which is asymptotically equivalent toO(N)
- The algorithms space complexity is
O(K)
, as we will be storing a maximum ofK+1
characters in the HashMap.
https://leetcode.com/problems/fruit-into-baskets/
Given an array of characters where each character represents a fruit tree, you are given two baskets, and your goal is to put the maximum number of fruits in each basket. The only restriction is that each basket can have only one type of fruit.
You can start with any tree, but you cant skip a tree once you have started. You will pick one fruit from each tree until you cannot, i.e., you will stop when you have to pick from a third fruit type.
Write a function to return the maximum number of fruits in both baskets.
This problem follows the Sliding Window pattern and is quite similar to Longest Substring with K Distinct Characters.
In this problem, we need to find the length of the longest subarray with no more than two distinct characters (or fruit types!).
This transforms the current problem into Longest Substring with K Distinct Characters where K=2
.
function totalFruit (fruits) {
let windowStart = 0
let windowMax = 0
let fruitMap = new Map()
//1. try to extend the window range
for(let windowEnd = 0; windowEnd < fruits.length; windowEnd++) {
let endFruit = fruits[windowEnd]
fruitMap.set(endFruit, fruitMap.get(endFruit)+1 || 1)
//2. Shrink the sliding window, until we are left with 2 fruits in the fruitMap
while(fruitMap.size > 2) {
let startFruit = fruits[windowStart]
fruitMap.set(startFruit, fruitMap.get(startFruit)-1)
if(fruitMap.get(startFruit) === 0){
fruitMap.delete(startFruit)
}
windowStart++
}
windowMax = Math.max(windowMax, windowEnd - windowStart + 1)
}
return windowMax
};
totalFruit ([3,3,3,1,2,1,1,2,3,3,4])
//5
totalFruit ([1,2,1])
//3,We can pick from all 3 trees.
totalFruit ([0,1,2,2])
//3,We can pick from trees [1,2,2].If we had started at the first tree, we would only pick from trees [0,1].
totalFruit ([1,2,3,2,2])
//4,We can pick from trees [2,3,2,2]. If we had started at the first tree, we would only pick from trees [1,2].
function fruitsInBaskets(fruits) {
let windowStart = 0;
let maxLength = 0;
let fruitFrequency = {};
//try to extend the range
for(let windowEnd = 0; windowEnd < fruits.length; window++) {
const endFruit = fruits[windowEnd]
if(!(endFruit in fruitFrequency)) {
fruitFrequency[endFruit] = 0
}
fruitFrequency[endFruit]++
//shrink the sliding window, until we are left with '2' fruits in the fruitFrequency hashMap
while(Object.keys(fruitFrequency).length > 2) {
const startFruit = fruits[windowStart];
fruitFrequency[startFruit]--
if(fruitFrequency[startFruit] === 0) {
delete fruitFrequency[startFruit]
}
windowStart++
}
maxLength = Math.max(maxLength, windowEnd - windowStart + 1)
}
return maxLength
}
fruitsInBaskets(['A', 'B', 'C', 'A', 'C'])//3 , We can put 2 'C' in one basket and one 'A' in the other from the subarray ['C', 'A', 'C']
fruitsInBaskets(['A', 'B', 'C', 'B', 'B', 'C'])//5 , We can put 3 'B' in one basket and two 'C' in the other basket. This can be done if we start with the second letter: ['B', 'C', 'B', 'B', 'C']
- The above algorithms time complexity will be
O(N)
, whereN
is the number of characters in the input array. The outerfor
loop runs for all characters, and the innerwhile
loop processes each character only once; therefore, the time complexity of the algorithm will beO(N+N)
, which is asymptotically equivalent toO(N)
. - The algorithm runs in constant space
O(1)
as there can be a maximum of three types of fruits stored in the frequency map.
https://leetcode.com/problems/longest-substring-with-at-most-two-distinct-characters/
Given a string, find the length of the longest substring in it with at most two distinct characters.
function lengthOfLongestSubstringTwoDistinct(s) {
let windowStart = 0
let maxLength = 0
let charFreq = {}
//try to extend the range
for(let windowEnd = 0; windowEnd < s.length; windowEnd++) {
const endChar = s[windowEnd]
if(!(endChar in charFreq)) {
charFreq[endChar] = 0
}
charFreq[endChar]++
//shrink the sliding window, until we are left
//with 2 chars in charFreq hashMap
while(Object.keys(charFreq).length > 2) {
const startChar = s[windowStart]
charFreq[startChar]--
if(charFreq[startChar] === 0) {
delete charFreq[startChar]
}
windowStart++
}
maxLength = Math.max(maxLength, windowEnd - windowStart + 1)
}
return maxLength
};
lengthOfLongestSubstringTwoDistinct('eceba')//3
lengthOfLongestSubstringTwoDistinct('ccaabbb')//5
https://leetcode.com/problems/longest-substring-without-repeating-characters/
Given a string, find the length of the longest substring, which has no repeating characters.
This problem follows the Sliding Window pattern, and we can use a similar dynamic sliding window strategy as discussed in Longest Substring with K Distinct Characters. We can use a HashMap to remember the last index of each character we have processed. Whenever we get a repeating character, we will shrink our sliding window to ensure that we always have distinct characters in the sliding window.
function nonRepeatSubstring(str) {
// sliding window with hashmap
let windowStart = 0
let maxLength = 0
let charIndexMap = {}
//try to extend the range [windowStart, windowEnd]
for(let windowEnd = 0; windowEnd < str.length; windowEnd++) {
const endChar = str[windowEnd]
//if the map already contains the endChar,
//shrink the window from the beginning
//so that we only have on occurance of endChar
if(endChar in charIndexMap) {
//this is tricky; in the current window,
//we will not have any endChar after
//it's previous index. and if windowStart
//is already ahead of the last index of
//endChar, we'll keep windowStart
windowStart = Math.max(windowStart, charIndexMap[endChar] + 1)
}
//insert the endChar into the map
charIndexMap[endChar] = windowEnd
//remember the maximum length so far
maxLength = Math.max(maxLength, windowEnd - windowStart+1)
}
return maxLength
};
nonRepeatSubstring("aabccbb")//3
nonRepeatSubstring("abbbb")//2
nonRepeatSubstring("abccde")//3
- The above algorithms time complexity will be
O(N)
, whereN
is the number of characters in the input string. - The algorithms space complexity will be
O(K)
, whereK
is the number of distinct characters in the input string. This also meansK<=N
, because in the worst case, the whole string might not have any repeating character, so the entire string will be added to the HashMap. Having said that, since we can expect a fixed set of characters in the input string (e.g., 26 for English letters), we can say that the algorithm runs in fixed spaceO(1)
; in this case, we can use a fixed-size array instead of the HashMap.
https://leetcode.com/problems/longest-repeating-character-replacement/
Given a string with lowercase letters only, if you are allowed to replace no more than
K
letters with any letter, find the length of the longest substring having the same letters after replacement.
This problem follows the Sliding Window pattern, and we can use a similar dynamic sliding window strategy as discussed in No-repeat Substring. We can use a HashMap to count the frequency of each letter.
- We will iterate through the string to add one letter at a time in the window.
- We will also keep track of the count of the maximum repeating letter in any window (lets call it
maxRepeatLetterCount
). - So, at any time, we know that we do have a window with one letter repeating
maxRepeatLetterCount
times; this means we should try to replace the remaining letters.- If the remaining letters are less than or equal to
K
, we can replace them all. - If we have more than
K
remaining letters, we should shrink the window as we cannot replace more thanK
letters.
- If the remaining letters are less than or equal to
While shrinking the window, we dont need to update maxRepeatLetterCount
(hence, it represents the maximum repeating count of ANY letter for ANY window). Why dont we need to update this count when we shrink the window? Since we have to replace all the remaining letters to get the longest substring having the same letter in any window, we cant get a better answer from any other window even though all occurrences of the letter with frequency maxRepeatLetterCount
is not in the current window.
function lengthOfLongestSubstring(str, k) {
let windowStart = 0
let maxLength = 0
let maxRepeatLetterCount = 0
let charFrequency = {}
//Try to extend the range [windowStart, windowEnd]
for(let windowEnd = 0; windowEnd < str.length; windowEnd++) {
const endChar = str[windowEnd]
if(!(endChar in charFrequency)) {
charFrequency[endChar] = 0
}
charFrequency[endChar]++
//*REVIEW THIS LINE*
maxRepeatLetterCount = Math.max(maxRepeatLetterCount, charFrequency[endChar])
//current window size is from windowStart to windowEnd, overall we have a letter which is
//repeating maxRepeatLetterCount times, this mean we can have a window which has one letter
//repeating maxRepeatLetterCount times and the remaining letters we should replace
//if the remaining letters are more than k, it is the time to shrink the window as we
//are not allowed to replace more than k letters
if((windowEnd - windowStart + 1 - maxRepeatLetterCount) > k) {
const startChar = str[windowStart]
charFrequency[startChar]--
windowStart++
}
maxLength = Math.max(maxLength, windowEnd - windowStart + 1)
}
return maxLength
}
lengthOfLongestSubstring("aabccbb", 2)//5, Replace the two 'c' with 'b' to have a longest repeating substring "bbbbb".
lengthOfLongestSubstring("abbcb", 1)//4, Replace the 'c' with 'b' to have a longest repeating substring "bbbb".
lengthOfLongestSubstring("abccde", 1)//3, Replace the 'b' or 'd' with 'c' to have the longest repeating substring "ccc".
- The above algorithms time complexity will be
O(N)
, whereN
is the number of letters in the input string. - As we expect only the lower case letters in the input string, we can conclude that the space complexity will be
O(26)
to store each letters frequency in the HashMap, which is asymptotically equal toO(1)
.
https://leetcode.com/problems/max-consecutive-ones-iii/
Given an array containing
0
's and1
's, if you are allowed to replace no more thanK
0
's with1
's, find the length of the longest contiguous subarray having all1
's.
This problem follows the Sliding Window pattern and is quite similar to Longest Substring with same Letters after Replacement. The only difference is that, in the problem, we only have two characters (1
's and 0
's) in the input arrays.
Following a similar approach, well iterate through the array to add one number at a time in the window. Well also keep track of the maximum number of repeating 1
's in the current window (lets call it maxOnesCount
). So at any time, we know that we can have a window with 1
's repeating maxOnesCount
time, so we should try to replace the remaining 0
's. If we have more than K
remaining 0
's, we should shrink the window as we are not allowed to replace more than K
0
's.
function lengthOfLongestSubstring (arr, k) {
let windowStart = 0
let maxLength = 0
let maxOnesCount = 0
//Try to extend the range [windowStart, windowEnd]
for(let windowEnd = 0; windowEnd < arr.length; windowEnd++) {
if(arr[windowEnd] === 1) {
maxOnesCount++
}
//current window size is from windowStart to windowEnd, overall we have a
//maximum of `1`'s repeating maxOnesCount times, this means we can have a window
//with maxOnesCount `1`'s and the remaining are `0`'s which should replace with `1`'s
//now, if the remaining `0`'s are more that k, it is the time to shrink the
//window as we are not allowed to replace more than k `0`'s
if((windowEnd - windowStart + 1 - maxOnesCount) > k) {
if(arr[windowStart] === 1) {
maxOnesCount--
}
windowStart++
}
maxLength = Math.max(maxLength, windowEnd - windowStart + 1)
}
return maxLength
}
lengthOfLongestSubstring ([0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1], 2)//6, Replace the '0' at index 5 and 8 to have the longest contiguous subarray of `1`'s having length 6.
lengthOfLongestSubstring ([0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1], 3)//9, Replace the '0' at index 6, 9, and 10 to have the longest contiguous subarray of `1`'s having length 9.
- The above algorithms time complexity will be
O(N)
, whereN
is the count of numbers in the input array. - The algorithm runs in constant space
O(1)
.
https://leetcode.com/problems/permutation-in-string/
Given a string and a pattern, find out if the string contains any permutation of the pattern.
Permutation is defined as the re-arranging of the characters of the string. For example, “abc”
has the following six permutations:
- abc
- acb
- bac
- bca
- cab
- cba
If a string has n
distinct characters, it will have n!
permutations.
This problem follows the Sliding Window pattern, and we can use a similar sliding window strategy as discussed in Longest Substring with K Distinct Characters. We can use a HashMap to remember the frequencies of all characters in the given pattern. Our goal will be to match all the characters from this HashMap with asliding windowin the given string. Here are the steps of our algorithm:
- Create a HashMap to calculate the frequencies of all characters in the pattern.
- Iterate through the string, adding one character at a time in the sliding window.
- If the character being added matches a character in the HashMap, decrement its frequency in the map. If the character frequency becomes zero, we got a complete match.
- If at any time, the number of characters matched is equal to the number of distinct characters in the pattern (i.e., total characters in the HashMap), we have gotten our required permutation.
- If the window size is greater than the length of the pattern, shrink the window to make it equal to the patterns size. At the same time, if the character going out was part of the pattern, put it back in the frequency HashMap.
function findPermutation(str, pattern) {
//sliding window
let windowStart = 0
let isMatch = 0
let charFrequency = {}
for(i = 0; i < pattern.length; i++) {
const char = pattern[i]
if(!(char in charFrequency)) {
charFrequency[char] = 0
}
charFrequency[char]++
}
//our goal is to math all the characters from charFrequency with the current window
//try to extend the range [windowStart, windowEnd]
for(windowEnd = 0; windowEnd < str.length; windowEnd++) {
const endChar = str[windowEnd]
if(endChar in charFrequency) {
//decrement the frequency of the matched character
charFrequency[endChar]--
if(charFrequency[endChar] === 0) {
isMatch++
}
}
if(isMatch === Object.keys(charFrequency).length) {
return true
}
//shrink the sliding window
if(windowEnd >= pattern.length - 1) {
let startChar = str[windowStart]
windowStart++
if(startChar in charFrequency) {
if(charFrequency[startChar] === 0) {
isMatch--
}
charFrequency[startChar]++
}
}
}
return false
}
findPermutation("oidbcaf", "abc")//true, The string contains "bca" which is a permutation of the given pattern.
findPermutation("odicf", "dc")//false
findPermutation("bcdxabcdy", "bcdxabcdy")//true
findPermutation("aaacb", "abc")//true, The string contains "acb" which is a permutation of the given pattern.
- The above algorithms time complexity will be
O(N + M)
, whereN
andM
are the number of characters in the input string and the pattern, respectively. - The algorithms space complexity is
O(M)
since, in the worst case, the whole pattern can have distinct characters that will go into the HashMap.
https://leetcode.com/problems/find-all-anagrams-in-a-string/
Given a string and a pattern, find all anagrams of the pattern in the given string.
Every anagram is a permutation of a string.
As we know, when we are not allowed to repeat characters while finding permutations of a string, we get N!
permutations (or anagrams) of a string having N
characters. For example, here are the six anagrams of the string “abc”
:
- abc
- acb
- bac
- bca
- cab
- cba
Write a function to return a list of starting indices of the anagrams of the pattern in the given string.
This problem follows the Sliding Window pattern and is very similar to Permutation in a String. In this problem, we need to find every occurrence of any permutation of the pattern in the string. We will use a list to store the starting indices of the anagrams of the pattern in the string.
function findStringAnagrams(str, pattern){
let windowStart = 0, matched = 0, charFreq = {}
for(let i = 0; i < pattern.length; i++){
const char = pattern[i]
if(!(char in charFreq)) {
charFreq[char] = 0
}
charFreq[char]++
}
const resultIndex = []
//our goal is to match all the characters from the charFreq
//with the current window try to
//extend the range [windowStart, windowEnd]
for(let windowEnd = 0; windowEnd < str.length; windowEnd++) {
const endChar = str[windowEnd]
if(endChar in charFreq) {
//decrement the frequency of matched character
charFreq[endChar]--
if(charFreq[endChar] === 0) {
matched++
}
}
if(matched === Object.keys(charFreq).length){
//have we found an anagram
resultIndex.push(windowStart)
}
//shrink the sliding window
if(windowEnd >= pattern.length -1) {
const startChar = str[windowStart]
windowStart++
if(endChar in charFreq) {
if(charFreq[startChar] === 0) {
//before putting the character back
//decrement the matched count
matched--
}
//put the character back
charFreq[startChar]++
}
}
}
return resultIndex
}
findStringAnagrams('ppqp', 'pq')//[1,2], The two anagrams of the pattern in the given string are "pq" and "qp".
findStringAnagrams('abbcabc', 'abc')//[2,3,4], The three anagrams of the pattern in the given string are "bca", "cab", and "abc".
- The time complexity of the above algorithm will be
O(N + M)
whereN
andM
are the number of characters in the input string and the pattern respectively. - The space complexity of the algorithm is
O(M)
since in the worst case, the whole pattern can have distinct characters which will go into the HashMap. In the worst case, we also needO(N)
space for the result list, this will happen when the pattern has only one character and the string contains only that character.
https://leetcode.com/problems/minimum-window-substring/
Given a string and a pattern, find the smallest substring in the given string which has all the characters of the given pattern.
This problem follows the Sliding Window pattern and has a lot of similarities with Permutation in a String with one difference. In this problem, we need to find a substring having all characters of the pattern which means that the required substring can have some additional characters and doesnt need to be a permutation of the pattern. Here is how we will manage these differences:
- We will keep a running count of every matching instance of a character.
- Whenever we have matched all the characters, we will try to shrink the window from the beginning, keeping track of the smallest substring that has all the matching characters.
- We will stop the shrinking process as soon as we remove a matched character from the sliding window. One thing to note here is that we could have redundant matching characters, e.g., we might have two a in the sliding window when we only need one a. In that case, when we encounter the first a, we will simply shrink the window without decrementing the matched count. We will decrement the matched count when the second a goes out of the window.
function findSubstring(str, pattern) {
let windowStart = 0
let matched = 0
let substrStart = 0
let minLength = str.length + 1
let charFreq = {}
for(let i = 0; i < pattern.length; i++) {
const char = pattern[i]
if(!(char in charFreq)) {
charFreq[char] = 0
}
charFreq[char]++
}
//try to extend the range [windowStart, windowEnd]
for(let windowEnd = 0; windowEnd < str.length; windowEnd++) {
const endChar = str[windowEnd]
if(endChar in charFreq) {
charFreq[endChar]--
if(charFreq[endChar] >= 0) {
//count every matching of a character
matched++
}
}
//Shrink the window if we can, finish as soon as we remove a
//matched character
while(matched === pattern.length) {
if(minLength > windowEnd - windowStart + 1) {
minLength = windowEnd - windowStart + 1
substrStart = windowStart
}
const startChar = str[windowStart]
windowStart++
if(startChar in charFreq) {
if(charFreq[startChar] === 0) {
matched--
}
charFreq[startChar]++
}
}
}
if(minLength > str.length) {
return ''
}
return str.substring(substrStart, substrStart + minLength)
}
findSubstring("aabdec", "abc")//"abdec", The smallest substring having all characters of the pattern is "abdec"
findSubstring("abdbca", "abc")//"bca", The smallest substring having all characters of the pattern is "bca".
findSubstring("adcad", "abc")//"", No substring in the given string has all characters of the pattern.
- The time complexity of the above algorithm will be
O(N + M)
whereN
andM
are the number of characters in the input string and the pattern respectively. - The space complexity of the algorithm is
O(M)
since in the worst case, the whole pattern can have distinct characters which will go into the HashMap. In the worst case, we also needO(N)
space for the resulting substring, which will happen when the input string is a permutation of the pattern.
https://leetcode.com/problems/substring-with-concatenation-of-all-words/
Given a string and a list of words
, find all the starting indices of substrings in the given string that are a concatenation of all the given words
exactly once without any overlapping of words
. It is given that all words
are of the same length.
This problem follows the Sliding Window pattern and has a lot of similarities with Maximum Sum Subarray of Size K. We will keep track of all the words
in a HashMap and try to match them in the given string. Here are the set of steps for our algorithm:
- Keep the frequency of every word in a HashMap.
- Starting from every index in the string, try to match all the
words
. - In each iteration, keep track of all the
words
that we have already seen in another HashMap. - If a word is not found or has a higher frequency than required, we can move on to the next character in the string.
- Store the index if we have found all the
words
.
function findWordConcatenation(str, words) {
if(words.length === 0 || words[0].length === 0) {
return []
}
let wordFreq = {}
words.forEach((word) => {
if(!(word in wordFreq)) {
wordFreq[word] = 0
}
wordFreq[word]++
})
const resultIndex = []
let wordCount = words.length
let wordLength = words[0].length
for(let i = 0; i < (str.length - wordCount * wordLength) + 1; i++) {
const wordsSeen = {}
for(let j = 0; j < wordCount; j++) {
let nextWordIndex = i + j * wordLength
//get the next word from the string
const word = str.substring(nextWordIndex, nextWordIndex + wordLength)
if(!(word in wordFreq)){
//break if we don't need this word
break
}
//add the word ot the wordsSeen ma
if(!(word in wordsSeen)){
wordsSeen[word] = 0
}
wordsSeen[word]++
//no need to process furrther if the word
//has higher frequency than required
if(wordsSeen[word] > (wordFreq[word] || 0)){
break
}
if(j + 1 === wordCount){
//store index if we have found all the words
resultIndex.push(i)
}
}
}
return resultIndex
}
findWordConcatenation("catfoxcat", ["cat", "fox"])//[0, 3], The two substring containing both the words are "catfox" & "foxcat".
findWordConcatenation("catcatfoxfox", ["cat", "fox"])//[3], The only substring containing both the words is "catfox".
- The time complexity of the above algorithm will be
O(N * M * Len)
whereN
is the number of characters in the given string,M
is the total number ofwords
, andLen
is the length of a word. - The space complexity of the algorithm is
O(M)
since at most, we will be storing all thewords
in the two HashMaps. In the worst case, we also needO(N)
space for the resulting list. So, the overall space complexity of the algorithm will beO(M+N)
.