Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Availability of LUBM test results #31

Open
peterjohnlawrence opened this issue Oct 23, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Availability of LUBM test results #31

peterjohnlawrence opened this issue Oct 23, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@peterjohnlawrence
Copy link

Are LUBM test results available for loading, querying, and maybe inferencing? http://swat.cse.lehigh.edu/projects/lubm/

The reason that I ask is that a lot of people see triple-stores as another database like SQL, rather than, as Halyard has done, an RDF schema implemented in a horizontally scalable database like Hadoop/Hbase. This would then provide a quantifiable response to

'I cannot use a triplestore, because I've been told I must use NoSQL/horizontally scalable database'

with

'Yes you can, it is

  • hugely scalable (see LUBM results),
  • standardized (see w3c standards re RDF, SPARQL),
  • well supported (see RDF4J),
  • ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants