feat: esplora client #12
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ccharly
reviewed
Dec 12, 2024
|
Yes I think this is the direction to go. |
ccharly
reviewed
Dec 13, 2024
Co-authored-by: River Kanies <[email protected]>
ccharly
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In an effort to align as close as possible with the
bdkAPI and the other FFI packages, theEsploraClientis exposed instead of wrapped inside a wallet, allowing the Wallet to be contained without external communications (storage or network).This also aligns very well with Clean Architecture principles.