Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Total incompatibility with UniDict mod... #16

Open
BigCasper opened this issue Oct 15, 2019 · 8 comments
Open

Total incompatibility with UniDict mod... #16

BigCasper opened this issue Oct 15, 2019 · 8 comments

Comments

@BigCasper
Copy link

The mod's fluid processor completely ignores resource unification by UniDict, having recipes with the wrong ingots (without their oredictionary entry). Please advise!

@BigCasper
Copy link
Author

I see that some might misinterpret it: If I set a particular mod to replace all other ingots in all recipes with it's own ingot, it doesn't do that for BC-Ore-Processing.

@BigCasper
Copy link
Author

Anybody? Is it in any way fixable?

@faceofcat
Copy link
Collaborator

it's probably fixable :)... but I don't have the time to look into it... :(

@BigCasper
Copy link
Author

it's probably fixable :)... but I don't have the time to look into it... :(

That's too bad... I'm developing a pack that revolves around your great mod, but this made it almost impossible to proceed with it. I'd be very greatful if you do even a quick dirty patch for it.

@BigCasper
Copy link
Author

it's probably fixable :)... but I don't have the time to look into it... :(

Quick and dirty meaning even if you just give us a config with "preffered output mod-owner" or more recipe control (like removing recipes for pre-registered BC-Ore-Processing Fluid) then it would absolutely fix all problems related to other mod compatibility.

@BigCasper
Copy link
Author

@faceofcat U lookin into it? Plox?

@faceofcat
Copy link
Collaborator

is your modpack available anywhere?... so I can see first hand what the issue is? :)

@BigCasper
Copy link
Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants