Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐞 Setting a keybind that includes a modifier key may omit the modifier key at random #634

Open
3 of 4 tasks
camstahamsta opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
3 of 4 tasks
Labels

Comments

@camstahamsta
Copy link

Bug Description

Attempting to add a new keybind that includes a modifier key (such as Control, Option, Command, or Shift) and a regular key may omit the modifier key at random.

Steps To Reproduce

  1. Set the Trigger Key to a modifier key, like Control.
  2. Add a new keybind for any action.
  3. Attempt to set the keybind to something that includes a modifier key, like Shift + M

Expected Behavior

If including a modifier key in a keybind (outside of the Trigger Key) is supported, the keybind should consistently accept the modifier key's inclusion each time it is set. If not supported, it should consistently deny it instead.

Actual Behavior

The modifier key is omitted from the keybind at random. General keys like letters and numbers are included as normal.

Screenshots

In the screen recording, I attempt to set a keybind for Shift + M with Option as the Trigger Key. The Shift key is omitted from the keybind at random.

Screen.Recording.2024-12-18.at.23.39.37-1.mov

macOS Version

Sequoia 15.3 Beta (24D5034f)

Loop Version

Version 🧪 1.2.0 (1383)

Additional Context

No response

Final Checks

  • My issue is written in English
  • My issue title is descriptive
  • This is a single bug (multiple bugs should be reported individually)
  • I can help with fixing or developing this issue (tick if you can help).
@MrKai77
Copy link
Owner

MrKai77 commented Dec 29, 2024

Hey sorry for the late response! Just tested this, was able to reproduce the bug! Which is super odd, will try and fix!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants