Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Melt pond questions #187

Open
kshedstrom opened this issue Nov 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Melt pond questions #187

kshedstrom opened this issue Nov 19, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@kshedstrom
Copy link
Contributor

In CICE, the melt pond area, volume, pond ice cover are carried in the model as scalars in each cell, not dimensioned by the number of categories. In each meltpond routine, they are then split up according to some local function to get ipondn (by ice category) and friends. What we have in SIS2 is melt pond area and mass by ice category. Do we continue with the plan to call Icepack?

@Hallberg-NOAA
Copy link
Member

I think that the plan is to call icepack when and where it makes sense to do so. However, if there are advantages to using a different scheme (as it seems might be the case here), I think that the plan is to incorporate any icepack capabilities into more general SIS2 code. Is this the case where the partially implemented approach in SIS2 is better, or do we want to follow the lead from icepack?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants