You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I received this timeout message for reservation”LS-cd202541ea“ and transition my internal reservationState machine to “ReserveTimeout” which is a stable state in the machine. However, the next time I queried this reservation I got the following:
It seems that even though the reservation timed out it remains in the “ReserveHeld” state. This presents a problem in that it is not a valid transition (ie. it should be in the ReserveTimeout state), and I still see my reservation in a ReserveHeld state but cannot commit it.
In the NSI CS 2.1 protocol the aggregator also models the reserve timeout state two provide a consistent view of the reservation throughout the connection hierarchy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue relates to state transitions in the reservationState machine. Using the following reserveTimeout message for illustration:
I received this timeout message for reservation”LS-cd202541ea“ and transition my internal reservationState machine to “ReserveTimeout” which is a stable state in the machine. However, the next time I queried this reservation I got the following:
It seems that even though the reservation timed out it remains in the “ReserveHeld” state. This presents a problem in that it is not a valid transition (ie. it should be in the ReserveTimeout state), and I still see my reservation in a ReserveHeld state but cannot commit it.
In the NSI CS 2.1 protocol the aggregator also models the reserve timeout state two provide a consistent view of the reservation throughout the connection hierarchy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: