Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add support of command line #219

Open
3 tasks
CunliangGeng opened this issue Mar 5, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
3 tasks

add support of command line #219

CunliangGeng opened this issue Mar 5, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@CunliangGeng
Copy link
Member

CunliangGeng commented Mar 5, 2024

Besides using nplinker in python environment, users may also like using command lines for nplinker. This feature request is originally from Artem.

Some example commands users might desire:

npl --help

npl load all                          # load all data

npl get bgcs                          # get all bgc data (in csv format?)
npl get bgcs --count                  # get the number of bgcs

npl get links                         # get all links (in csv format?)
npl get links --filter "some-filter"  # get filtered links (what format of filter to use?)

Questions

  • what requirements users might have on command lines
  • for what tasks users prefer using command line

Tasks

  • send the questions to the community
@justinjjvanderhooft
Copy link

Great suggestion Cunliang - perhaps good to ask in the Slack channel as well? And discuss in the next community call? I would see opportunities for large(r) scale computation of scores, and the streamlined/validated loading of paired data.

@CunliangGeng CunliangGeng added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 5, 2024
@CunliangGeng
Copy link
Member Author

@justinjjvanderhooft Artem asked for this feature and will add some requirements to this issue.

@artfet
Copy link

artfet commented Mar 7, 2024

I was thinking that it would be great if you could run NPLinker directly from the command line with some simple standard inputs, such as what the input data is and where to write the results data (all running with standard parameters in this case). Currently it seems a bit confusing as to how NPLinker should be run to me. I am sorry if my description is a bit too vague, but feel free to ask if what I said was confusing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants