Jd/fixes area balancing models

[jd-lara]

closes #1107

[github-actions]

Performance Results

Version	Precompile Time
Main	3.209087648
This Branch	3.369946315

Version	Build Time
Main-Build Time Precompile	51.106315366
Main-Build Time Postcompile	1.194522667
This Branch-Build Time Precompile	51.243373091
This Branch-Build Time Postcompile	1.218833678

Version	Build Time
Main-Solve Time Precompile	1661.691636165
Main-Solve Time Postcompile	1640.550410694
This Branch-Solve Time Precompile	525.887757141
This Branch-Solve Time Postcompile	494.254999986

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 70.06369% with 47 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 77.89%. Comparing base (b405b10) to head (53fc090).
Report is 42 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...s_models/device_constructors/branch_constructor.jl	69.23%	16 Missing ⚠️
...ices/common/objective_function/piecewise_linear.jl	0.00%	14 Missing ⚠️
src/devices_models/devices/area_interchange.jl	66.66%	6 Missing ⚠️
src/parameters/update_parameters.jl	42.85%	4 Missing ⚠️
src/core/parameters.jl	40.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...vice_constructors/thermalgeneration_constructor.jl	96.55%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/devices_models/devices/AC_branches.jl	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/feedforward/feedforward_arguments.jl	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
.../simulation/initial_condition_update_simulation.jl	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1130      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.44%   77.89%   +0.45%     
==========================================
  Files         118      118              
  Lines       12658    12700      +42     
==========================================
+ Hits         9803     9893      +90     
+ Misses       2855     2807      -48     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	77.89% <70.06%> (+0.45%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ce_constructors/renewablegeneration_constructor.jl	92.72% <100.00%> (ø)
...devices_models/devices/common/add_to_expression.jl	78.03% <ø> (ø)
src/devices_models/devices/electric_loads.jl	95.45% <100.00%> (ø)
src/feedforward/feedforward_constraints.jl	73.48% <ø> (+11.39%)	⬆️
src/initial_conditions/initialization.jl	96.72% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
src/operation/time_series_interface.jl	63.63% <ø> (ø)
src/parameters/add_parameters.jl	65.65% <100.00%> (+0.35%)	⬆️
src/services_models/services_constructor.jl	97.60% <100.00%> (+13.90%)	⬆️
...vice_constructors/thermalgeneration_constructor.jl	98.30% <96.55%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
src/devices_models/devices/AC_branches.jl	81.20% <66.66%> (+0.13%)	⬆️
... and 7 more

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

[rodrigomha]

This looks good. We may need to QA/QC the DCP/PTDF models for AreaInterchange.

Besides the testing, this should be fine for generalizing

[rodrigomha]

It also:
Closes #1100
Closes #1103
Closes #1134
Closes #1135
via #1136