You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using a tcnn Hash Encoding + Cutlass MLP to train a neural field. I would like to access second derivatives to implement a smoothing loss during training, as well as obtain gradients for performing trajectory optimization over the neural field.
I noticed that double backwards support has been implemented for tcnn.Encoding here. However, the example uses a torch MLP which is much slower. When trying to obtain 2nd derivatives with a tcnn.Network MLP instead, a backward_backward_input_impl: not implemented error is thrown.
Here is a minimal example for testing:
import torch
import tinycudann as tcnn
device = torch.device("cuda:0" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")
class NeuralField(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.encoding = tcnn.Encoding(
n_input_dims=2,
encoding_config={
"otype": "HashGrid",
"n_levels": 8,
"n_features_per_level": 8,
"log2_hashmap_size": 19,
"base_resolution": 16,
"per_level_scale": 1.2599210739135742,
"interpolation": "Smoothstep"
},
)
tot_out_dims_2d = self.encoding.n_output_dims
self.mlp = tcnn.Network(
n_input_dims=tot_out_dims_2d,
n_output_dims=1,
network_config={
"otype": "CutlassMLP",
"activation": "ReLU",
"output_activation": "None",
"n_neurons": 256,
"n_hidden_layers": 3,
},
)
def forward(self, x):
x = self.encoding(x)
x = self.mlp(x)
return x
if __name__ == "__main__":
nf = NeuralField()
nf.to(device)
x = torch.rand(10, 2, requires_grad=True).to(device)
y = nf(x)
# 2 methods of obtaining 2nd derivative - both give the same error
method = 0
if method == 0:
grad = torch.autograd.grad(y.sum(), x, create_graph=True)[0]
grad_2 = torch.autograd.grad(grad.sum(), x)[0]
else:
grad = torch.autograd.grad(y, x, torch.ones_like(y, device=x.device),
create_graph=True, retain_graph=True, only_inputs=True)[0]
grad_2 = torch.autograd.grad(grad, x, torch.ones_like(grad, device=x.device),
create_graph=False, retain_graph=False, only_inputs=True)[0]
The full error trace is:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "tcnn_double_backward.py", line 54, in <module>
grad_2 = torch.autograd.grad(grad.sum(), x)[0]
File "/home/navlab/anaconda3/envs/nemo/lib/python3.8/site-packages/torch/autograd/__init__.py", line 394, in grad
result = Variable._execution_engine.run_backward( # Calls into the C++ engine to run the backward pass
File "/home/navlab/anaconda3/envs/nemo/lib/python3.8/site-packages/torch/autograd/function.py", line 288, in apply
return user_fn(self, *args)
File "/home/navlab/anaconda3/envs/nemo/lib/python3.8/site-packages/tinycudann/modules.py", line 145, in backward
doutput_grad, params_grad, input_grad = ctx.ctx_fwd.native_tcnn_module.bwd_bwd_input(
RuntimeError: DifferentiableObject::backward_backward_input_impl: not implemented error
Are there any plans to implement double backward for tcnn.Network? It would be greatly helpful for my project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I am using a tcnn Hash Encoding + Cutlass MLP to train a neural field. I would like to access second derivatives to implement a smoothing loss during training, as well as obtain gradients for performing trajectory optimization over the neural field.
I noticed that double backwards support has been implemented for tcnn.Encoding here. However, the example uses a torch MLP which is much slower. When trying to obtain 2nd derivatives with a tcnn.Network MLP instead, a
backward_backward_input_impl: not implemented error
is thrown.Here is a minimal example for testing:
The full error trace is:
Are there any plans to implement double backward for tcnn.Network? It would be greatly helpful for my project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: