You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for the great work on this project! I am currently using the code and have some questions regarding the storage size calculation of the hash grid.
I noticed some discrepancies in the expected and actual storage sizes. Could you please clarify how the storage size for the hash grid is calculated in your implementation? Specifically:
the param size is correct here: (256**2+128**2+64**2+32**2+16**2+8**2+4**2+2**2)*8 = 699040, since the coarest level with 2**2 features would be aligned with 8, so the final param size should be: (256**2+128**2+64**2+32**2+16**2+8**2+4**2+8)*8 = 699072
The correct number of params should be: (2**2+4**2)*8=160, while the 2**2 would be aligned with 8, so the final param size would be: (8+4**2)*8=192, which is different from the real results.
It really confused me. Did I miss something? I appreciate any insight you can provide. Thanks in advance for your assistance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for the great work on this project! I am currently using the code and have some questions regarding the storage size calculation of the hash grid.
I noticed some discrepancies in the expected and actual storage sizes. Could you please clarify how the storage size for the hash grid is calculated in your implementation? Specifically:
the param size is correct here:
(256**2+128**2+64**2+32**2+16**2+8**2+4**2+2**2)*8 = 699040
, since the coarest level with2**2
features would be aligned with8
, so the final param size should be:(256**2+128**2+64**2+32**2+16**2+8**2+4**2+8)*8 = 699072
Another case is as following:
the param size is:
(1)*8=8
, but the number of features should be aligned with8
, so the final param is8*8=64
However, the following case seems to be incorrect:
The correct number of params should be:
(2**2+4**2)*8=160
, while the2**2
would be aligned with8
, so the final param size would be:(8+4**2)*8=192
, which is different from the real results.It really confused me. Did I miss something? I appreciate any insight you can provide. Thanks in advance for your assistance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: