Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Larger images with shapefix and augmentation #40

Open
gngdb opened this issue Feb 27, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Larger images with shapefix and augmentation #40

gngdb opened this issue Feb 27, 2015 · 4 comments
Assignees
@scottclowe
Labels
help wanted in progress
Milestone
Pylearn2 models

Comments

@gngdb
Copy link
Member

gngdb commented Feb 27, 2015

Train a shapefix network with larger images and augmentation. Make notes about how much memory is used with different augmentation levels.
@gngdb gngdb added this to the Pylearn2 models milestone Feb 27, 2015
@gngdb gngdb added the ready label Feb 27, 2015
@gngdb
Copy link
Member Author

gngdb commented Feb 28, 2015

So apparently my phone always creates duplicate github issues every time...

@gngdb gngdb self-assigned this Feb 28, 2015
@gngdb gngdb closed this as completed Feb 28, 2015
@gngdb gngdb removed the ready label Feb 28, 2015
@gngdb gngdb reopened this Feb 28, 2015
@gngdb
Copy link
Member Author

gngdb commented Mar 2, 2015

This is on hold at the moment, need to rethink what runs to start.

@gngdb
Copy link
Member Author

gngdb commented Mar 5, 2015

Larger images with augmentation. 96 by 96 with similar augmentation to what we're using at the moment is worth a shot.

@gngdb gngdb removed their assignment Mar 5, 2015
@scottclowe
Copy link
Member

No going so well. Validates with only 3.5 on when trained on test 10%.

@scottclowe scottclowe self-assigned this Mar 14, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@scottclowe scottclowe

Labels
help wanted in progress
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Pylearn2 models
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@gngdb @scottclowe