Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

performance of test result #4

Open
JongMokKim opened this issue Dec 30, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

performance of test result #4

JongMokKim opened this issue Dec 30, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@JongMokKim
Copy link

Hello! Thank you for great work.

I'm interested in training the network with my custom data.
To validate your training script, I ran train.py with not changing train parameters (only data path)
What I'm concerning is that the performance is much more poor than you reported:
acc : 92.02, F1 : 56.95, Prec:43.99, Recall : 87.72
(your report : acc :95.5, F1:65, Prec:55, Recall:81)

which parameter should I tune? or is there any other factor can affect the performance?

thanks in advance!

@NickLucche
Copy link
Owner

Sorry for the delayed answer, I might have submitted the wrong model, let me look into that and I'll get back to you.
In the meantime, you should try running the test.py script instead, making sure to test on the provided test set.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants