You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@lilyinstarlight says it's a side-effect of nixVersions.nix_2_3 defining most of it's relevant attributes in a file different from default.nix (common.nix). I suspect nix is not the only one doing it.
Proposal: extend ofborg to also handle direct $attr.meta.maintainers expand attributes right from the commit message (and possibly filter only on packages affected by the rebuild if reasonably feasible). I suspect that is what it does today to fetch tests and build the attribute.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Example PR: NixOS/nixpkgs#276696
There:
nix_2_3
(ornixVersions.nix_2_3
) was explicitly specified in commit message.nix repl
agrees$attr.meta.maintainers
does exist:nix-repl> nixVersions.nix_2_3.meta.maintainers
=>[ { ... } { ... } ]
nixVersions.nix_2_3
rebuild@lilyinstarlight says it's a side-effect of
nixVersions.nix_2_3
defining most of it's relevant attributes in a file different fromdefault.nix
(common.nix
). I suspectnix
is not the only one doing it.Proposal: extend
ofborg
to also handle direct$attr.meta.maintainers
expand attributes right from the commit message (and possibly filter only on packages affected by the rebuild if reasonably feasible). I suspect that is what it does today to fetch tests and build the attribute.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: