Can the Data Types section be replaced by a reference to the format registry?

[darrelmiller]

Instead of this paragraph, can we reference this https://spec.openapis.org/registry/format/index.html

[handrews]

I think we'd have to talk about which formats are MUST/SHOULD/MAY be supported.

[LasneF]

notice few of them has no source like

• decimal
• int16 (vs int32 is set as OAS)
• http date where we could put the RFC
• decimal128
• char
• base64url

notice that to me decimal is highly debatable as does not belong to a standard and clear definition

is 1 a decimal ? is 1.0 a decimal what is the parsing expression that should be applied having a dot ?
is 4.5e3 a decimal , but then what about 4.5345e3

as this format is mentionned as not interoperable , should it be part of an open standard ?

this may apply the rules MUST / SHOULD / MAY .... and not listed in this table , meaning what is the criteria to be in
having interoperability and defined standard may be a criteria, then all that is not is custom extension