Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement ability to load OSTIA sea ice data in pre-processor #5

Open
simonrp84 opened this issue Jun 1, 2018 · 6 comments
Open

Implement ability to load OSTIA sea ice data in pre-processor #5

simonrp84 opened this issue Jun 1, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@simonrp84
Copy link
Collaborator

The data we currently use for sea ice extent is very low resolution (something like 1 degree) and poorly-suited to the pixel size of most imaging instruments. The Operational Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Analysis is at 0.05 degree resolution, so implementing this will reduce the 'blockiness' of retrievals in ice-prone regions.

@simonrp84 simonrp84 self-assigned this Jun 1, 2018
@caropoulsen
Copy link

caropoulsen commented Jun 1, 2018 via email

@simonrp84
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No. ECMWF data does contain a sea ice flag (that we can already read if we choose the right driver option) but that is also lower resolution (0.125 degree at best).
Some details about OSTIA are here: http://ghrsst-pp.metoffice.com/pages/latest_analysis/ostia.html

The Nowcasting SAF has implemented OSTIA within their cloud processing and - based on an afternoon of playing around with it - the addition of this product makes a nice difference there. Should be the same for us.

@caropoulsen
Copy link

caropoulsen commented Jun 1, 2018 via email

@simonrp84
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No, I have not made the changes - this doesn't affect any of my work so it's low priority.
But I thought I'd raise the issue to remind me to look into it if I get some free time. The additions are non-trivial so don't expect it any time soon!

@simonrp84
Copy link
Collaborator Author

As part of this I have now included better snow albedo values, previously these were only defined for 4 wavelengths (0.67, 0.8, 1.6 and 3.9 micron). Now we have 40 wavelengths across VIS and IR. The most suitable albedo is found by interpolating the channel central wavelength to the closest wavelengths in the albedo database. Albedo values are from the ASTER spectral library.

Note: Ice is not included, only snow. Am searching for better ice values.

OSTIA work is still ongoing (slowly).

@simonrp84
Copy link
Collaborator Author

No longer developing new ORAC features, unassigning myself.

@simonrp84 simonrp84 removed their assignment Jan 8, 2019
adamcpovey pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants