Skip to content

PROJ Provenance Review

Kristian Evers edited this page Sep 10, 2019 · 9 revisions

See the guidelines for the provenance review here: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Code_Provenance_Review

Project History

Summarise the history of the source code, including discussion about code ownership and license over time.

Libraries

List or reference a table of included libraries and/or components. Include:

  • Library Name
  • License
  • Whether the library licence is compatible with the project
  • Whether the library is compiled into the project's releases, or required as an external dependancy
  • Whether the library is included in the project's code repository
  • Issue? (link if issue if one exists)
  • Ok? (Yes/No/Black - implies not checked yet)
  • Comment(s)
Library License Compatible? Included in core? Issue(s)? OK? Comments
SQLite Public Domain Yes No Yes
nlohmann/json MIT Yes Yes Yes
lrucache11 BSD Yes Yes Yes License and author is attributed in the relevant source file

Source Files

List of source files, including code, documentation and data, including:

  • File name
  • License
  • Copyright Holder (if known)
  • License header included?
  • Issue? (link if issue if one exists)
  • Ok? (Yes/No/Black implies not checked yet)
  • Comment(s)

The list of source files and their license status is maintained on Google Docs:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Bdu73lw8I1iFX4cb7CIUF6yqWGDTcZKBfW0cUsEjCXk/edit?usp=sharing

Copyright Holders

List or reference all copyright holders of the project's source files. These are all the people that would need to be contacted if the license of the project is to be changed. List:

  • Organisation or person
  • Contact details for Organisation or person
  • Issue? (link if issue if one exists)
  • Comments
Copyright Holder Contact details Issue? Comments

Committers

List or reference a table of committers, including:

  • Committer name
  • Commit username in code repository
  • Committer's employer(s) (if applicable)
  • Committer (or employer) has signed contribution agreement? (yes/no)
Committer Username Affiliation Contribution Agreement Signed? OK?
Frank Warmerdam warmerdam No Yes
Even Rouault rouault Spatialys No Yes
Kristian Evers kbevers SDFE No Yes
Thomas Knudsen busstoptaktik SDFE No Yes
Howard Butler hobu Hobu Inc No Yes
Mike Taves mwtoews GNS Science No Yes
Kurt Schwehr schwehr Google No Yes
Charles Karney cffk No Yes

The project has opted to not ask committers to sign a contribution agreement because 1) the MIT license is permissive which eliminates the desire to re-license the software, 2) it's an added layer of complexity to the project and 3) some developers has expressed that they will not sign such an agreement. An article on the problems with instating a contribution agreement can be found here

Further Issues

List or reference a list of any outstanding issues not already listed above. Typically link to issues in project's issue tracker.

Clone this wiki locally