Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

r3.in.v5d: Fix unchecked return value #4141

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ShubhamDesai
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request addresses an issue identified by Coverity Scan (CID: 1207300), where the return value of the lseek function is not checked.

@github-actions github-actions bot added C Related code is in C module raster3d labels Aug 5, 2024
raster3d/r3.in.v5d/v5d.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@nilason nilason changed the title raster3d: Fix unchecked return value r3.in.v5d: Fix unchecked return value Aug 8, 2024
echoix
echoix previously requested changes Aug 13, 2024
raster3d/r3.in.v5d/v5d.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
raster3d/r3.in.v5d/v5d.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
raster3d/r3.in.v5d/v5d.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
raster3d/r3.in.v5d/v5d.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
raster3d/r3.in.v5d/v5d.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
raster3d/r3.in.v5d/v5d.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@echoix echoix dismissed their stale review September 26, 2024 15:26

My requested changes were addressed

@wenzeslaus wenzeslaus removed the request for review from echoix September 26, 2024 15:27
@wenzeslaus wenzeslaus enabled auto-merge (squash) September 26, 2024 15:30
@wenzeslaus wenzeslaus merged commit 549ea90 into OSGeo:main Sep 26, 2024
26 checks passed
@neteler neteler added this to the 8.5.0 milestone Sep 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C Related code is in C module raster3d
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants