You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not sure why we chose id's over IRI's. Probably because this features (csv download) was added for our non-technical colleagues who are somewhat daunted by IRI's. I'll ask around to see how they feel about ID's vs. IRI's.
In the export file atramhasis_export.csv, we see that the broader, narrower and related concepts are referred to by their IDs (e.g. 885, 323). Instead, if these were referred to by their IRIs (https://id.erfgoed.net/thesauri/erfgoedtypes/885, https://id.erfgoed.net/thesauri/erfgoedtypes/323), these would be unambiguous (and, if your CSV editor turns them into links, easier to follow!).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: