You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the moment the function grb-evaluate () will evaluate geometries and their formula and compares theme with other version to give an indication if the geometry can be actualised automatically or not. This function is a first base-implementation but can be improved with more logic and cases
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
# TODO: research for aanduid_id 116448 (equality after 0.5m), 120194 (1m)
# TODO: research and implementation of following ideas
# TODO: refine equality comparison, make it more generic
# TODO: Add control of OD to equality-comparison (see case aanduid_id 120288)
# ideas:
# * If result_diff smaller than 0.x --> automatic update
# * big polygons: If 'outer ring' has same formula (do net check inner side) -->
# automatic update
# ** outer ring can be calculated: 1) negative buffer 2) original - buffered
at the moment, the evaluation-function gives an evaluation for all predicted geometries. Maybe we should also rank these evaluations so we can already give a list of the 'best' evaluations?
At the moment the function grb-evaluate () will evaluate geometries and their formula and compares theme with other version to give an indication if the geometry can be actualised automatically or not. This function is a first base-implementation but can be improved with more logic and cases
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: