Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UDP based job manager #604

Closed
jdries opened this issue Aug 19, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

UDP based job manager #604

jdries opened this issue Aug 19, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jdries
Copy link
Collaborator

jdries commented Aug 19, 2024

Support a job manager that automatically creates jobs based on the schema of a UDP.

Prototype is already available here, with some valid comments that should be taken into account:
ESA-APEx/esa-apex-toolbox-python#1

@JeroenVerstraelen
Copy link
Contributor

There is a PR, just needs small adjustments.

@jdries jdries linked a pull request Oct 1, 2024 that will close this issue
soxofaan added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2024
…alone utility

Finetune openeo.internal.processes.parse to properly support this
(e.g. leverage named tuples for immutability, less boilerplate and out of the box equality checks)
soxofaan added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2024
improves long term traceability and observability
soxofaan added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2024
…alone utility

Finetune openeo.internal.processes.parse to properly support this
(e.g. leverage named tuples for immutability, less boilerplate and out of the box equality checks)
soxofaan added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2024
improves long term traceability and observability
soxofaan added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2024
soxofaan added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 11, 2024
@soxofaan
Copy link
Member

worked on PR at #644

@soxofaan
Copy link
Member

#644 is ready for review/mering I think

@soxofaan
Copy link
Member

merged #644

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants