Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Specification pattern for dummies #291

Open
bzeuner opened this issue May 2, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Specification pattern for dummies #291

bzeuner opened this issue May 2, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
@karthik-sethuraman @hingkamlam @nigel-r-davis @amazzini
Labels
UmlModelingGuidelines UML Modeling Guidelines

Comments

@bzeuner
Copy link
Contributor

bzeuner commented May 2, 2018

This issue is dealing with the «Specify» abstraction (i.e, not inheritance, «StrictComposite» or «ExtendedComposite») and supports the federation of models.
A clear definition of the «Specify» abstraction is missing; like:

  • Which problems can the mechanism solve?
  • Usage rules?

It was stated, that the mechanism must be open for enhancements.

A draft definition of the «Specify» abstraction was provided by Andrea:
Draft_Definition_Specify-abstraction.docx
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@karthik-sethuraman karthik-sethuraman

@hingkamlam hingkamlam

@nigel-r-davis nigel-r-davis

@amazzini amazzini

Labels
UmlModelingGuidelines UML Modeling Guidelines
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@karthik-sethuraman @bzeuner @hingkamlam @nigel-r-davis @amazzini