-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhancement to improve linking between databus, MOSS and OEMetadata #139
Comments
Update: Insights and Issues:
|
@kurzum We have this tutorial that demonstrates the usage using python: In general the endpoints are: get your api token & inlcude in all requests
Create new table:topic_name can be "model_draft" or "sandbox" (only for testing) PUT request to The Requests must include the table definition
Upload dataPOST request to Add data to the request:
Update dataPOST request to include data Upload metadataPOST request to add metadata json Delete TableDELETE request to |
I just inspected the suggestion for additional fields here: #158 |
Description of the issue
we just had a discussion on how to improve the link between databus und OEMetadata. It needs a few addtional header fields in OEMetadata 2.0.
Ideas of solution
Describe possible ideas for solution and evaluate advantages and disadvantages.
Workflow checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: