You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As per commit a5c7e0b and this Zulip conversation, the name of the validity status column varies between competitions. We should settle on a column name with LFC and start using it across the board.
Not only the column name, but the allowable values need to be standardize. This is a prerequisite for being able to do meaningful cross-competition comparison in Global View: if we want to ask "How far did this proposal get?" across different competitions, then the stages a proposal can go through in each competition have to be commensurate.
(Relatedly, not all competitions show invalid as well as valid proposals, but that's issue #80.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
kfogel
changed the title
Standardize name of validity status column (admin review status column).
For Global View: Standardize name of validity status column (admin review status column).
Nov 30, 2020
As per commit a5c7e0b and this Zulip conversation, the name of the validity status column varies between competitions. We should settle on a column name with LFC and start using it across the board.
Not only the column name, but the allowable values need to be standardize. This is a prerequisite for being able to do meaningful cross-competition comparison in Global View: if we want to ask "How far did this proposal get?" across different competitions, then the stages a proposal can go through in each competition have to be commensurate.
(Relatedly, not all competitions show invalid as well as valid proposals, but that's issue #80.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: