You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
micahalcorn opened this issue
Jul 3, 2023
· 0 comments
Labels
analyticsWork related to analyticsenhancementNew feature or requestfrontendWorks related to frontendOETHOETH related thingsOUSDOUSD releated thingsP2Small number of users are affected, major cosmetic issueui/uxWorkd that requires design and product overview
Because OETH and OUSD are able to regulate their respective Curve token supplies via AMOs, it doesn't do us much good to track them as a success metric. As long as the peg for each token is properly maintained, the supply should always be approximately the same as ETH or 3Crv. The AMOs also mean that we should never have to worry about having sufficient liquidity for users to be able to purchase the tokens. What matters is how deep the liquidity is for the other side of the pair. Users want to know that if they acquire OETH, they can swap it in Curve for ETH without much price impact.
After all that typing, I realize we've already made this change for OETH in the analytics report email but not for OUSD. We should also update the label to make it clearer.
Current
Preferred (example)
w/e 25 Jun
w/e 02 Jul
Curve ETH liquidity
7,322
9,226
Curve DAI+USDC+USDT liquidity
644,779
822,519
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
analyticsWork related to analyticsenhancementNew feature or requestfrontendWorks related to frontendOETHOETH related thingsOUSDOUSD releated thingsP2Small number of users are affected, major cosmetic issueui/uxWorkd that requires design and product overview
Because OETH and OUSD are able to regulate their respective Curve token supplies via AMOs, it doesn't do us much good to track them as a success metric. As long as the peg for each token is properly maintained, the supply should always be approximately the same as ETH or 3Crv. The AMOs also mean that we should never have to worry about having sufficient liquidity for users to be able to purchase the tokens. What matters is how deep the liquidity is for the other side of the pair. Users want to know that if they acquire OETH, they can swap it in Curve for ETH without much price impact.
After all that typing, I realize we've already made this change for OETH in the analytics report email but not for OUSD. We should also update the label to make it clearer.
Current
Preferred (example)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: