[documentation] The documentation needs major improvements #673
Replies: 2 comments
-
@karelkryda : Oxalis is Open source project and we are already working on improved documentation for our paying members. For membership details, please refer: https://www.oxalis.network/join We also tried to provide minimal documentation for non-paying member. Please refer: https://github.com/OxalisCommunity/oxalis/wiki. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @aaron-kumar, The problem is that you are the person who knows your software and knows what it can or can't do. I'm not sure I'm the right person to create documentation for your software. The documentation basically contains the bulk of the "To be documented" sections. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi,
We recently implemented Oxalis standalone as a sender and Oxalis server as a receiver running in a Tomcat instance.
During the implementation, we noticed a lot of problems with the documentation, which is very simplified and sometimes not even understandable. This problem affects both Oxalis itself and the AS4 plugin.
The list of components is inconsistent, it is not obvious which component can be used for which part of the job, the installation and use of each component is also described very vaguely.
The documentation is very messy in places and we had to figure out a lot of things on our own. For example, we only found out from the code that you can use not only the file path as input parameter
-f
, but also the directory path or use-
to read from the console.I would like to ask you to spend some time to edit and improve the documentation, which is very important.
Thank you in advance for your understanding
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions