You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We typically want the hyper-resistivity to be at the grid scale $\Delta x$ stronger than the Hall term:
This issue is about implementing a grid-scale hyper-resistive dissipation tuned per level.
Given the local dx, and the local B and n, Ohm should adjust the hyper-resistive coef to damp grid scale fluctuation efficiently.
We typically want the hyper-resistivity to be at the grid scale$\Delta x$ stronger than the Hall term:
This issue is about implementing a grid-scale hyper-resistive dissipation tuned per level.
Given the local dx, and the local B and n, Ohm should adjust the hyper-resistive coef to damp grid scale fluctuation efficiently.
Some notes:
^equiv
At grid scale we have$j\sim B\Delta x^{-1}$ and $\nabla^2\sim \Delta x^{-2}$ so [[#^equiv]] becomes:
So, given$\nu_0$ the hyper-resistive coefficient that is empirically convenient for $B=n=\Delta x=1$ we need to have:
We need estimates of B and n, we could imagine having a local average estimate of B and n per level taking the average for instance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: