You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We've been trying to use the px4flow on our pixhawk running arducopter, but our major problem was that the i2c bus was so polluted that we suffered from lots of data losses and delays: sometimes the signal got blocked for seconds and even tens of seconds !
We found out that there was that OPTICAL_FLOW_RAD mavlink message, which seemed to us like a perfect clone of the OPTICAL_FLOW message, being sent at the same time as the OPTICAL_FLOW messages, and only one of the two were consummed on the ardupilot (arducopter) end.
The fix that we found and spectacularly resolved all of our problems was just commenting the lines where that "clone" message was sent over i2c.
I don't know what is the primary use of that message, if it is a suitable way to fix the problem or if that problem should be addressed on the ardupilot's end or on the px4flow's end, so that's why I'm signaling and asking you.
Cheers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi guys,
We've been trying to use the px4flow on our pixhawk running arducopter, but our major problem was that the i2c bus was so polluted that we suffered from lots of data losses and delays: sometimes the signal got blocked for seconds and even tens of seconds !
We found out that there was that OPTICAL_FLOW_RAD mavlink message, which seemed to us like a perfect clone of the OPTICAL_FLOW message, being sent at the same time as the OPTICAL_FLOW messages, and only one of the two were consummed on the ardupilot (arducopter) end.
The fix that we found and spectacularly resolved all of our problems was just commenting the lines where that "clone" message was sent over i2c.
I don't know what is the primary use of that message, if it is a suitable way to fix the problem or if that problem should be addressed on the ardupilot's end or on the px4flow's end, so that's why I'm signaling and asking you.
Cheers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: