Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CO_331:0000220 and CO_331:0000218 are the same #90

Open
reyzaguirre opened this issue May 17, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

CO_331:0000220 and CO_331:0000218 are the same #90

reyzaguirre opened this issue May 17, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@reyzaguirre
Copy link

In spbase 0000220 is Weight of commercial storage roots measuring kg per plot. As synonym it appears CRW which I think is fine.
In the ontology 0000220 is Weight of commercial storage roots measuring kg per plot, and again synonym is CRW, so it is fine.
In spbase I downloaded data with column label weight of commercial storage roots|CO_331:0000218 which looks like the same.
In the ontology 0000218 is Weight of root that are 12 to 20 cm long and at least 10 cm in diameter. As attribute it says Weight per plot, and as synonym it appears RYTHA which is clearly wrong because RYTHA is total weight (commercial plus non commercial) in tons per hectare.

@vhualla
Copy link
Contributor

vhualla commented May 17, 2019

Could you change the description in the trait CO_331:0000218
Weight of all roots that weigh more than 100g
The synonym is ok CRW
CO_331:0000220 (Variable) and CO_331:0000218 (trait)

@vhualla vhualla assigned vhualla and bellerbrock and unassigned vhualla May 17, 2019
@bellerbrock
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed the curation issue in sweetpotatobase. Still need to change the definition

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants