Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Workflow Request with DICOMweb, HL7, and FHIR get rejected #389

Open
mocsharp opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Workflow Request with DICOMweb, HL7, and FHIR get rejected #389

mocsharp opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mocsharp
Copy link
Collaborator

mocsharp commented Sep 1, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When data comes into MIG from DICOMweb, HL7 & FHIR services, the AE Title field is empty and therefore, the workflow request message is rejected.

Describe the solution you'd like
A workflow definition should not make the AE Title (informatics_gateway>ae_title) field required. When data arrives without an AE Title, WM shall attempt to match any workflows without an AE Title.

Describe alternatives you've considered
NA

@mocsharp mocsharp added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 1, 2022
@mocsharp mocsharp added this to the 0.2 milestone Sep 1, 2022
@mocsharp mocsharp changed the title Workflow Request with DICOMweb, HL7, and FHIR are not rejected Workflow Request with DICOMweb, HL7, and FHIR are rejected Sep 2, 2022
@mocsharp mocsharp changed the title Workflow Request with DICOMweb, HL7, and FHIR are rejected Workflow Request with DICOMweb, HL7, and FHIR get rejected Sep 2, 2022
@JoeBatt1989 JoeBatt1989 modified the milestones: 0.2.0, 0.30 Dec 19, 2022
@woodheadio woodheadio added enhancement New feature or request and removed bug Something isn't working labels Jan 19, 2023
@woodheadio woodheadio removed this from the 0.3.0 milestone Jan 19, 2023
@mocsharp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants