You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 1, 2023. It is now read-only.
Hi, we are trying to implement an ERC2981 standard NFT, where the royalty receiver is different for every token IDs. After testing on OpenSea, it seems that only the minter of the first NFT is set as the royalty receiver for all token IDs, which can be seen from the creator fee:
In the contract we implemented _setTokenRoyalty(tokenId, to, defaultRoyalty)
function mintNFT(
address to,
string memory uri
) public onlyRole(DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE) returns (uint256) {
require(!hasRole(DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE, to), "Admins cannot receive NFTs");
uint256 tokenId = _tokenIdCounter.current();
_tokenIdCounter.increment();
_safeMint(to, tokenId);
_setTokenURI(tokenId, uri);
_setTokenRoyalty(tokenId, to, defaultRoyalty);
return tokenId;
}
Please advise if it is possible to have dynamic creator fee royalty, thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, we are trying to implement an ERC2981 standard NFT, where the royalty receiver is different for every token IDs. After testing on OpenSea, it seems that only the minter of the first NFT is set as the royalty receiver for all token IDs, which can be seen from the creator fee:
In the contract we implemented _setTokenRoyalty(tokenId, to, defaultRoyalty)
Please advise if it is possible to have dynamic creator fee royalty, thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: