You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using the current master branch or the latest release. Please indicate:
Describe the Bug
The gas storage investment cost uses the wrong data field. We set:
defadd_gas_storage(data):
# [...]investment=gas_storage.loc['Total cost, 100 mio Nm3 active volume'].iloc[0]
Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, the "Total cost, 100 mio Nm3 active volume" field simply tells us the cost of the natural gas needed to fill the the 100mio storage cavern. Actually using the "Specific investment [MEUR/MWh]" field gives a value that is about 7 times higher.
The documentation for the add_gas_storage function helpfully tells me that "add gas storage tech data, different methodolgy than other sheets and therefore added later". Could someone chip on why the methodology is different for gas storage? To me it looks like we clearly need to drop the manual investment cost part of that function. Maybe the charger/discharger parts of the function should remain, but gas storage itself could be added just like e.g. hydrogen underground storage is added (no special treatment needed)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Checklist
master
branch or the latest release. Please indicate:Describe the Bug
The gas storage investment cost uses the wrong data field. We set:
Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, the "Total cost, 100 mio Nm3 active volume" field simply tells us the cost of the natural gas needed to fill the the 100mio storage cavern. Actually using the "Specific investment [MEUR/MWh]" field gives a value that is about 7 times higher.
The documentation for the
add_gas_storage
function helpfully tells me that "add gas storage tech data, different methodolgy than other sheets and therefore added later". Could someone chip on why the methodology is different for gas storage? To me it looks like we clearly need to drop the manual investment cost part of that function. Maybe the charger/discharger parts of the function should remain, but gas storage itself could be added just like e.g. hydrogen underground storage is added (no special treatment needed)?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: