Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[EPIC] Improve traceability in the API #1269

Open
Tansito opened this issue Mar 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[EPIC] Improve traceability in the API #1269

Tansito opened this issue Mar 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority: medium Medium priority project: gateway Label to identify features related with gateway project
Milestone
Q2'24

Comments

@Tansito
Copy link
Member

Tansito commented Mar 28, 2024

What is the expected enhancement?

When we have an error or we want to analyze a succession of events we don't have enough information from traces or the traces that we have are not the best ones. My proposal is to add traces in:

  • Views: for requests and responses with not sensitive information like id of a Job or a Program
  • Serializers: add traces with interesting information in the different overrided methods
  • Scheduler / Ray: review traces that we have here
@Tansito Tansito added enhancement New feature or request priority: high High priority project: gateway Label to identify features related with gateway project labels Mar 28, 2024
@Tansito
Copy link
Member Author

Tansito commented Mar 28, 2024

Ref: #1263

@Tansito Tansito added priority: medium Medium priority and removed priority: high High priority labels Mar 28, 2024
@Tansito Tansito added this to the Q2'24 milestone Mar 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority: medium Medium priority project: gateway Label to identify features related with gateway project
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Q2'24
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Tansito