Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] All-In-One (Server+Website) to be in one App #41

Open
vzool opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

[Feature Request] All-In-One (Server+Website) to be in one App #41

vzool opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@vzool
Copy link
Member

vzool commented Feb 9, 2023

No description provided.

@zigazajc007
Copy link
Member

zigazajc007 commented Feb 9, 2023

This would defeat the zero-trust architecture. Server and Website needs to be separate in order to achieve truly zero-trust architecture. Passky Server and Server Administrator should never know the data that user manage with Passky Website.

For example lets say that you are using Official Passky Client and connect to a random suspicious Passky Server. The Administrator of suspicious Passky Server will only be able to get encrypted data (Because of Zero-trust architecture) and your data will still be safe unless he manages to get your master password (Probably thru phishing attack).

For me, correct implemented Zero-trust architecture is a lot more important than having All-In-One option.

@vzool
Copy link
Member Author

vzool commented Feb 9, 2023

I already made the PR, so this may further the discussion about it. 🤗

@NOXITB
Copy link

NOXITB commented Aug 21, 2023

I already made the PR, so this may further the discussion about it. 🤗

Hello We Would Like to inform you that we will not be adding this to the repository as it breaks zero trust as well as people who are not aware of how it works make create a security risk if you would like to add 2 seperate scripts we would be happy to take a look into this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants