We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It would make sense to publicly state which implementation we follow, to make sure impl details are not arbitrary (besides "it works"). https://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_3.1.1/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/pkgformat.html https://xyrillian.de/thoughts/posts/argh-pm.html http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-file-format-rpm-file-format.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, I'll add some documentation about it.
Sorry, something went wrong.
https://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_3.1.1/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/pkgformat.html
Note that "no rpm version from the last 20 years produces output that is actually compatible with LSB"
rpm-software-management/rpm#1292 (comment)
No branches or pull requests
It would make sense to publicly state which implementation we follow, to make sure impl details are not arbitrary (besides "it works").
https://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_3.1.1/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/pkgformat.html
https://xyrillian.de/thoughts/posts/argh-pm.html
http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-file-format-rpm-file-format.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: