You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
it is useful to detach servo after movement in cases like:
limit current consumption (servo mechanic could keep position without electronic control for small forces)
limit servo vibrations (usually present in cheap servos) - sometimes we can observe vibrations after reaching designed position
In current implementation (if I understood correctly) detach() is not controlling pwm state and can disable pwm during high state and move servo to different position.
It would be great to support some safe detach, which will check if pwm is not in active state and won't change servo position.
Proposal for interface:
detach(bool isSafe=false); //false default to keep backward compatibility
or
safeDetach();
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
it is useful to detach servo after movement in cases like:
In current implementation (if I understood correctly) detach() is not controlling pwm state and can disable pwm during high state and move servo to different position.
It would be great to support some safe detach, which will check if pwm is not in active state and won't change servo position.
Proposal for interface:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: